Sunday, November 10, 2013

Analysis of "To be or not to be" Soliloquy and Mis En Scene Interpretations #15


Imagery that refers to the uncertainty of death:
ay, there’s the rub, For in that sleep of death what dreams may come When we have shuffled off this mortal coil”(3.1.66-68).
“Thus conscience does make cowards of us all, And thus the native hue of resolution Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought”(3.1.84-86).

Imagery that refers to the negative experiences of life:
Hamlet says that some of the negative experiences in life consists of, ““Th' oppressor’s wrong, the proud man’s contumely, The pangs of despised love, the law’s delay, The insolence of office, and the spurns That patient merit of th' unworthy takes.”(3.1.72-75). In addition, I argue that an important negative experience in life comes to light when Hamlet compares “something after death” to “The undiscovered country from whose bourn No traveler returns”(3.1.79-81). He is saying how the uncertainty of life after death creates a sense of despair for people because they can never be sure enough to make a decision whether to take their life or live through life. I believe that this reflects that a negative experience from life is the uncertainty of life after death.

Appeals that Hamlet uses to convince and/or motivate his audience:
Logos
“Who would fardels bear, To grunt and sweat under a weary life, But that the dread of something after death.”(3.1.77-79). He is logically asking a rhetorical question of why someone would want to suffer so much and work so hard to make it through the problems in life if they did not believe that some greater punishment or despair may be in store for them after life.

Significance of Literary Devices:
Paradox
The main point of this soliloquy revolves around discussing the difference between life and death. A main paradox present in the soliloquy was the fact that there may actually be a life after death in which the horrors of true life come back to haunt you.
Parallelism
Hamlet runs a parallel between things such as life after death and dreaming in order to show the similarities and differences between them and how, especially the similarities, are very important in the development of the human fear of death.
The Infinitive
This made many of the themes that Hamlet was talking about more universal to encompass each and every person and how they all face the question: To be or not to be?
 Synecdoche
This helped to add a lot of imagery within the soliloquy which resulted in a greater amount of intensity because of the detail that was being described.
Tone
Hamlet created a very gloomy tone because as he was pondering the benefits of death, he soon stumbles across the idea that even with Death, a stage of eternity that is supposed to take you away from the hardships of life, you may still be haunted by the problems of life. He goes through his inner debates, and each conclusion to his debate adds to the gloomy tone.
Diction
The vivid diction he uses helps to distinguish various tones he wants to generate. For example, when he uses words such as “grunt” and “sweat”, the tone of the piece intensifies because he isn’t saying to be merely “tired” but a more descriptive and intense synonym to generate a slightly gloomy tone.
Metaphor
Hamlet draws comparisons between two similar things to show the complex nature of something that seems quite simple. It helps him to paint a much more defined picture of what he is trying to express to the audience.

Two primary metaphors Hamlet uses in speech:
The comparison of Dying to Sleeping/ Dreaming to Life after Death
The truth about an after-life to an undiscovered country

Evidence of established comparisons:
Life on earth
the whips and scorns of time, Th' oppressor’s wrong, the proud man’s contumely, The pangs of despised love, the law’s delay, The insolence of office, and the spurns That patient merit of th' unworthy takes.”(3.1.71-75).
Afterlife
something after death, The undiscovered country from whose bourn No traveler returns”(3.1.79-81).
Death
To die, to sleep— No more—and by a sleep to say we end The heartache and the thousand natural shocks flesh is heir to—’tis a consummation Devoutly to be wished!”(3.1.61-65).
Humans
Thus conscience does make cowards of us all, And thus the native hue of resolution Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought, And enterprises of great pith and moment With this regard their currents turn awry, And lose the name of action.”(3.1.84-89).
Thinking
That is the question— Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, Or to take arms against a sea of troubles, And, by opposing, end them?”(3.1.57-61).

Three oppositions present in the arguments Hamlet makes:
Life vs. Death
Believing vs. Non-believing
Thinking less/Doing more vs. Thinking more/ Doing less

Eternal Philosophical Questions that Hamlet Ponders:
Hamlet asks the key question: “To be, or not to be?”(3.1.57). This question is encompassing his inner conflict of deciding whether it is better to be alive and face the horrors and struggles of life, or whether it is better to take your life and accept death as a way to escape these problems with life. Hamlet also wonders, “Who would fardels bear, To grunt and sweat under a weary life, But that the dread of something after death,  The undiscovered country from whose bourn No traveler returns, puzzles the will And makes us rather bear those ills we have Than fly to others that we know not of?”(3.1.77-83). He goes deeper into his thinking to wonder why people who are not preoccupied by any situation after death are afraid to die. This brings up the theme of religion because this choice of wanting to die to escape troubles ultimately circles back to whether you believe that there is some type of life after death that may be just as, if not more, punishing as life.

Hamlet’s Conclusions:

Initially, when Hamlet ponders the benefits of death, he says that with death, “we end The heartache and the thousand natural shocks.”(3.1.62-63). His initial thought process is more simplistic because he just takes into account the fact that dying will result in being taken out of a world and life that has many horrors. However, he goes on and adds complexity to his thought when he says, “ay, there’s the rub, For in that sleep of death what dreams may come When we have shuffled off this mortal coil”(3.1.66-68). This clearly shows us that he thinks that through an eternal sleep, one may dream, and there is a possibility that these eternal dreams focus on the unresolved problems that were faced in life. So, he realizes that death may not simply be an end to someone’s sorrows. Then after he questions the possibility of some type of life after death, he says that “conscience does make cowards of us all, And thus the native hue of resolution Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought.”(3.1.84-86). This clearly shows us how he believes that no matter ones belief’s, no one can be certain of the one’s situation after death because no one who has died has returned to tell the tale. Therefore, due to this uncertainty, people overthink the presence of life after death, and the small thought in their minds of this possibility instills a fear in them that makes them too cowardice to take their own lives.

Acting Analysis

Kenneth Branagh
For the entire scene, the camera is angled over Hamlet’s shoulder and it is focused on a mirror that reflects Hamlet as he slowly walks towards it. Although he is in a big hall, the camera angle consolidates the space to focus on a single mirror in the room over Hamlet’s shoulder. This consolidation of the surroundings shows the intensity of the speech. This soliloquy revolves around Hamlet pondering the question of whether it is better to live in a world with many horrors or die to escape from it. This camera angle shows him looking him to his reflection which signifies how Hamlet is delving into the depths of his soul in order to answer the question, “To be or not to be?” Also, Hamlet is slowly walking towards the mirror and his reflection slowly gets larger, this shows his growing intensity as he finds the complex nature of his debate. The diegetic sound is the primary type of sound used in this scene, and it consists of Hamlet’s voice as he is giving the soliloquy as well as the moment he pulls his dagger out of his sheath and it makes a grinding metallic noise that is associated with the wielding of a weapon. This sound of his dagger emphasizes the part of the speech when he says bodkin. The non-diegetic sound consists of quiet, but high pitched screeching. This sound starts when he is talking about the hardships of life and is helps to create a mood of despair. Also, the moment he pulls out his dagger, an editing cut quickly shows a close up of Claudius’s surprised face. This edit is very meaningful because as Hamlet unveils a tool of murder, it quickly shows Claudius who is the man that Hamlets wants to kill for revenge. The fact that Claudius jumps back a little bit when Hamlet brings out his sword shows the apprehension that Claudius has over Hamlet’s actions. In addition, Hamlet is in all black clothes to represent two things: his grievance over his father, as well as the gloom revolving the subject matter of wanting to take one’s life to escape the horrors of life. The make-up used was mainly for camera purposes to make sure that sufficient light reflected off of his face so that the audience could clearly see the Hamlet’s emotions.

Laurence Oliver
The scene begins at the bottom of a castle or dungeon. It is very dark and gloomy, as the camera starts to spiral and move upwards the spiral staircase. Soon, the camera sees daylight, and it shows Hamlet as he walks to the edge of the cliff. The sound during this beginning part of the scene is all non-diegetic. The sound for this portion consists of very loud and assertive background music that generates a very intense atmosphere to serve as a build up for when Hamlet begins his soliloquy. When Hamlet begins to speak, the background music dissipates and the diegetic sounds of Hamlet’s voice and the ocean waves breaking against the rocks take over. A very important editing cut that was made was that when Hamlet began to talk about death, the camera angle would change to a long distance, bird-eye view of the ocean. This use of editing and camera angles established the connection between the setting of crashing waves and death. Also a medium angle shot is used when Hamlet gives his speech in order to encompass all of the intense emotion that he displays, not only through facial expression, but also body language. In addition, he never makes eye contact with the camera; rather, he is peering out into the sea which signifies his peering out into an abyss that is strongly connected with death. Also, Hamlet pulls out his dagger very early in the soliloquy and his use of this prop was very important. As he would speak about how death is a way to escape the horrors of life, he would point the dagger to his own throat in order to symbolize the very realistic option of taking his own life. Also, when he starts to talk about humans being cowards, the medium angle shot capture his sudden shift in body language. All of a sudden, he closes his body off to the audience and looks away from the ocean. This signifies how he is still a coward and how he does not wish to be a part of the ocean abyss which represents death. The costume just reinforces the overall setting of the play which consists of a castle in Elsinore, with Hamlet being a prince. In addition, the make-up reflects the sunlight which helps the audience to see Hamlet’s facial expressions.

Mel Gibson
The scene begins by Hamlet walking down the stairs into a dark cellar. When he reaches the bottom of the cellar, his face appears very dark and serious. He is in a black costume which signifies the grievance over his father as well as the gloomy mood surrounding the soliloquy. The darkness of the setting signifies a very serious, and gloomy subject matter. The camera angles were often times closed up on Hamlet’s face in order to show his dynamic emotion throughout the scene. Also, all of the sound is diegetic because it all comes from Hamlet’s voice as he speaks, as well as sounds from objects he interacts around him. Lighting is very key in this scene because whenever he talks about death, or any gloomy subject matter, he is in an area of the room where is covered by darkness. However, when he starts to make realization and connections, there is light that shines on his face. The seclusion of this setting is very representative of the soliloquy because this soliloquy consists of Hamlet entering into his own deep thoughts. Just as the actual speech reveals Hamlet entering his inner dark thoughts, you see Hamlet entering a dark room, contemplating the difference between life and death, and then leaving the room after some general conclusion had been made. Make-up for this scene was probably used to ensure that Hamlet’s face had a darker shade when the lighting decreased.

Ethan Hawke
From the start of the scene, there is some non-diegetic background music that is playing and it sound very somber and gloomy. In addition, the diegetic sound consists of the narration and the actual voice  of the main characters thoughts as he walks through the movie store, it also consists of an action movie that is playing on the wall in which it seems like people are dying. He is wearing a black suit with black pants and a black shirt. This presence of black signifies that this Hamlet may have gone through some grieving process or is very distraught. The main camera angle consists of a close-up and moves with him as he is walking. The setting is very important because he is walking through the Action aisle which creates an intense mood for the viewer from the beginning. In addition, based on his walk down the aisle, it becomes apparent that he is not really on a hunt for a movie because he does not seem to be paying much attention to the specific titles. It just seems as if he is strolling through, thinking to himself. This reveals his contemplative nature. The setting is also interesting because it is a modern-day setting or a video store. However, his dialogue still consists of the dialogue within the actual Shakespearian play, so the dialogue has not been interpreted to a modern time period. Close up camera angles are also used to show the emotion on his face as he contemplates the nature of life and death. In addition, he never makes direct eye contact with the camera because he wants do develop a mood that shows him secluded in his own thoughts.

I believe that Kenneth Baranagh most skillfully depicts my situation. The setting in which he said the soliloquy was crucial because it reflected his contemplative nature. As I saw this actor Hamlet give his speech into a mirror as he stared at his reflection, I could feel the true intense inner contemplation that he was undergoing. Not only that, but the intensity in his eyes and the expression of his face overwhelmed me with a sensation of seriousness. His clothing was also very appropriate. The dark black clothing showed the grievance that he had toward his father as well as the dark nature of the revenge that he is seeking. In addition, his use of the bodkin was astounding. When he pulled the dagger out of his sheath and he held it onto his face, I could feel the intensity of the though-process that he was going through as he debated life and death. In addition, the camera angles were very effective because they showed him closing up on the mirror. He begins very far away, which shows that he is just at the beginning of this contemplative journey. However, as he approaches the mirror, his reflection get bigger, and as the camera close up more, it becomes evident that he progressively is delving farther in to the depths of his soul. Also, his speaking style blew me away. What enthusiasm he had! This Hamlet would put the perfect amount of each type of emotion into every word that he said. All in all, I believe that his actor Hamlet was the best at representing the true, intense contemplative nature of the debate between life and death.

In regards to the Ethan Hawke version, I would have adapted the script more towards a modern speaking style while still maintain a comparable level of sophistication and complexity in order to make sure that all areas of mis en scene are consistent with each other. In addition, for the Kenneth Baranagh, I believe that his use of the prop was good but it could have been more powerful like the Laurence Oliver version. In the Laurence Oliver version, the sharp point of the dagger is directly pointed towards him, which depicts the contemplation of taking his own life with much more intensity. Also, in the Laurence Oliver, I believe that there were positives and negatives to the setting used. I believe that the use of the ocean as a symbol for death was good, but I believe that it didn’t reflect his true inner contemplative nature as much because he was out in the open. I believe that the perfect location would be in a cave carved out in the middle of the cliff that still peers out into the ocean, but also creates the sense of seclusion and inner thinking. Also, I believe that the Laurence Oliver version needed more varied camera angles in order to capture the dynamic emotion of Hamlet. The primary camera angle used was a medium angle, so it was hard for the audience to connect with Hamlet at a deeper emotional level since they were not able to witness the subtle changes in facial expression and emotion.

  

No comments:

Post a Comment